跳转至内容
  • home
  • News
  • How to
  • Coin information
  • Bot Lab
  • General Discussion
  • 最新
  • 热门
  • 标签
皮肤
  • 浅色
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • 深色
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • 默认(不使用皮肤)
  • 不使用皮肤
折叠

Coinsori

  1. 主页
  2. News
  3. 'Not Your Market Price': Nick Szabo Questions Who Controls Bitcoin ETF Pricing After Jane Street Allegations

“并非市场定价”:尼克·萨博质疑在简氏资本的指控之后,谁在控制比特币ETF的定价

已定时 已固定 已锁定 已移动 News
1 帖子 1 发布者 2 浏览
  • 从旧到新
  • 从新到旧
  • 最多赞同
回复
  • 在新帖中回复
登录后回复
此主题已被删除。只有拥有主题管理权限的用户可以查看。
  • K 离线
    K 离线
    kim
    写于 最后由 编辑
    #1

    Against the backdrop of the escalating scandal surrounding trading firm Jane Street, which has been accused of excessive manipulation of the crypto market, well-known cryptography pioneer Nick Szabo stated in a recent post his position on the real risks that Bitcoin and ETFs carry. Szabo expressed strong skepticism toward Wall Street and once again reminded readers that cryptocurrency was created precisely to get rid of such trusted intermediaries.

    His main theses can be conditionally divided into the following: Bitcoin ETFs committed negligence by entrusting market-making to structures like Jane Street, which can play against their own clients. That is why capital is flowing out of ETFs and into Bitcoin in particular, because people are losing trust not in Bitcoin, but in the dirty methods of Wall Street.

    "Not your keys, not your coin": Nick Szabo

    Szabo's words have confirmation since, according to SoSoValue data, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs have lost $179 million since the beginning of February alone. In general, the outflow has been ongoing since November 2025, and over these four months it has amounted to more than $6 billion, which is more than 10% of the total value of inflows for the entire time since their launch.
    u_today_5fbadeb48094b-a3a54b8f60cda478895a4218ce0dbeac-resized.webp
    According to Szabo, the main conclusion from this situation is “not your keys, not your coins,” and any dependence on intermediaries like Jane Street is a security driver. While the market celebrated the arrival of institutions, Szabo and others saw only a return of the problems of traditional finance that Bitcoin was supposed to solve.

    Interestingly, Szabo evaluated Jane Street's participation in the collapse of the algorithmic stablecoin UST from Terraform Labs and the token LUNA as natural selection.

    In his words, the fact that Jane Street "knocked down this Jenga tower" is good because, if a protocol cannot be broken, then it deserves to survive. If it is like UST or LUNA, then what happened is what should have happened.

    Read original article on U.Today
    source: https://www.tradingview.com/news/u_today:5fbadeb48094b:0-not-your-market-price-nick-szabo-questions-who-controls-bitcoin-etf-pricing-after-jane-street-allegations/

    1 条回复 最后回复
    0

    你好!看起来您对这段对话很感兴趣,但您还没有一个账号。

    厌倦了每次访问都刷到同样的帖子?您注册账号后,您每次返回时都能精准定位到您上次浏览的位置,并可选择接收新回复通知(通过邮件或推送通知)。您还能收藏书签、为帖子顶,向社区成员表达您的欣赏。

    有了你的建议,这篇帖子会更精彩哦 💗

    注册 登录
    回复
    • 在新帖中回复
    登录后回复
    • 从旧到新
    • 从新到旧
    • 最多赞同


    • 登录

    • 没有帐号? 注册

    • 登录或注册以进行搜索。
    Powered by NodeBB Contributors
    • 第一个帖子
      最后一个帖子
    0
    • home
    • News
    • How to
    • Coin information
    • Bot Lab
    • General Discussion
    • 最新
    • 热门
    • 标签