跳转至内容
  • home
  • News
  • How to
  • Coin information
  • Bot Lab
  • General Discussion
  • 最新
  • 热门
  • 标签
皮肤
  • 浅色
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • 深色
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • 默认(不使用皮肤)
  • 不使用皮肤
折叠

Coinsori

  1. 主页
  2. News
  3. Saylor Names Key Reason Why Back Is Not Satoshi

Saylor 明确指出,背后的真正原因在于,他并非 Satoshi

已定时 已固定 已锁定 已移动 News
1 帖子 1 发布者 1 浏览
  • 从旧到新
  • 从新到旧
  • 最多赞同
回复
  • 在新帖中回复
登录后回复
此主题已被删除。只有拥有主题管理权限的用户可以查看。
  • K 离线
    K 离线
    kim
    写于 最后由 编辑
    #1

    Renowned investigative journalist John Carreyrou has named Blockstream CEO and cypherpunk veteran Adam Back as the elusive inventor of Bitcoin after an 18-month investigation.

    However, Strategy founder Michael Saylor was quick to point to a glaring historical flaw that effectively debunks the theory.

    Carreyrou's investigation relies heavily on a forensic technique known as "stylometry." The statistical analysis of linguistic style, phrasing, and writing patterns.

    After Satoshi's known forum posts and whitepaper with Adam Back's historical writings, Carreyrou concluded that the two are the same person.

    However, Saylor pointed to the most obvious piece of evidence contradicting the Times report: Satoshi and Back actively communicated with one another.

    "Stylometry is interesting, but not proof," Saylor stated. "The contemporaneous emails between Satoshi and Adam Back suggest they were distinct individuals."

    In the early days of Bitcoin's development, Satoshi famously emailed Back to discuss Hashcash, a proof-of-work system Back invented in 1997, which Satoshi cited in the Bitcoin whitepaper. For Carreyrou's theory to hold true, Back would have had to meticulously forge an email correspondence with his own alter ego to lay a false trail.

    Saylor concluded his post by reiterating the only standard of proof the crypto community will ever accept: "Until someone signs with Satoshi’s keys, every theory is just narrative."

    "A huge target on Adam's Back"

    Saylor was not alone in dismissing the report. Bitcoin evangelist Jameson Lopp has slammed the publication for endangering Back based on flimsy linguistic analysis. "Satoshi Nakamoto can't be caught with stylometric analysis," Lopp wrote. "Shame on you for painting a huge target on Adam's back with such weak evidence."

    Bloomberg's Joe Weisenthal claims that stylometry is a flawed tool for this specific group of developers. "I wasn't, however, 100% convinced by the evidence or the conclusion," he noted. "The stylometry is interesting, but on content, ofc all the cypherpunks had similar thoughts on politics and privacy and the architecture of the internet."
    source: https://www.tradingview.com/news/u_today:8a2cc0424094b:0-saylor-names-key-reason-why-back-is-not-satoshi/

    1 条回复 最后回复
    0

    你好!看起来您对这段对话很感兴趣,但您还没有一个账号。

    厌倦了每次访问都刷到同样的帖子?您注册账号后,您每次返回时都能精准定位到您上次浏览的位置,并可选择接收新回复通知(通过邮件或推送通知)。您还能收藏书签、为帖子顶,向社区成员表达您的欣赏。

    有了你的建议,这篇帖子会更精彩哦 💗

    注册 登录
    回复
    • 在新帖中回复
    登录后回复
    • 从旧到新
    • 从新到旧
    • 最多赞同


    • 登录

    • 没有帐号? 注册

    • 登录或注册以进行搜索。
    Powered by NodeBB Contributors
    • 第一个帖子
      最后一个帖子
    0
    • home
    • News
    • How to
    • Coin information
    • Bot Lab
    • General Discussion
    • 最新
    • 热门
    • 标签