跳转至内容
  • home
  • News
  • How to
  • Coin information
  • Bot Lab
  • General Discussion
  • 最新
  • 热门
  • 标签
皮肤
  • 浅色
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • 深色
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • 默认(不使用皮肤)
  • 不使用皮肤
折叠

Coinsori

  1. 主页
  2. News
  3. Is the Corporate Bitcoin Treasury Trend Dead? Saylor’s Strategy Is the Only One Buying

公司层面持有比特币的趋势是否已经结束?目前,只有萨勒(Saylor)的策略仍在持续购买比特币

已定时 已固定 已锁定 已移动 News
1 帖子 1 发布者 2 浏览
  • 从旧到新
  • 从新到旧
  • 最多赞同
回复
  • 在新帖中回复
登录后回复
此主题已被删除。只有拥有主题管理权限的用户可以查看。
  • K 离线
    K 离线
    kim
    编写于 最后由 admin 编辑
    #1

    The corporate Bitcoin treasury movement had a great story. Dozens of public companies piling into Bitcoin, a structural shift in how institutions manage capital, a new floor under the price. CryptoQuant just put some hard numbers on where that story stands today.

    In the last 30 days, Strategy bought 45,000 BTC. Every other treasury company in existence bought roughly 1,000 combined.

    That’s a 99% collapse in participation from everyone except Michael Saylor.

    One Company, 76% of Everything

    Strategy now holds approximately 76% of all Bitcoin owned by corporate treasury companies, according to CryptoQuant. Their share of total 30-day purchases has reached an extraordinary level, while other companies’ share has fallen to just 2%, down from 95% at the peak of the corporate buying wave.

    CryptoQuant’s read on this is direct: “There is no broad corporate demand right now.”

    What made this data point significant is the timing. Corporate buying participation peaked at 69,000 BTC in August 2025. Bitcoin was climbing and the narrative was building. Then prices dropped, and the conviction evaporated.

    Some Companies Are Selling Too

    Bitdeer Technologies liquidated its entire Bitcoin position, going from 2,029 BTC to zero. Genius Group sold roughly 58% of its Bitcoin holdings to pay down a Bitcoin-backed loan. Cango sold nearly 60% of its stack.

    These weren’t small retail players. These were companies that publicly announced Bitcoin treasury strategies and bought near the top.

    Strategy did the opposite. As prices fell, Saylor’s firm accelerated, making this its fastest accumulation pace since April 2025.

    What This Means for Bitcoin

    Corporate buying was one of the loudest structural arguments for Bitcoin’s 2025 run to over $126,000. Companies buying and holding permanently removes supply from the market, creating a floor under the price.

    That floor now rests almost entirely on two companies. Strategy is the dominant force. Metaplanet, the Tokyo-listed firm that has become the fourth-largest corporate Bitcoin holder with 35,102 BTC, is the only other name still actively building.

    Just this month, Metaplanet raised $234 million through a new warrant structure specifically to buy more Bitcoin, with a stated target of 100,000 BTC by the end of 2026.

    Two companies with conviction. Most others have either gone quiet or are actively selling into the drawdown.

    FAQs

    Could heavy concentration of Bitcoin holdings in a few companies create risks for the market?
    Yes, concentration introduces potential systemic pressure points. If a dominant holder were ever forced to sell—due to liquidity needs, debt obligations, or regulatory issues—it could create sudden supply shocks. Markets tend to price in diversified demand more favorably; when ownership is concentrated, price stability can become more dependent on the decisions of a small number of actors.

    What indicators should investors watch to see if corporate demand is returning?
    Beyond headline purchases, investors should monitor corporate filings (like quarterly reports), treasury policy updates, and capital raise announcements tied to digital assets. Another key signal is whether companies begin allocating a fixed percentage of reserves to Bitcoin rather than making opportunistic buys. A shift toward structured allocation strategies would suggest longer-term institutional commitment rather than narrative-driven participation.

    How might this trend affect retail investors and smaller institutions?
    Reduced corporate participation can shift market influence back toward ETFs, retail flows, and macro-driven liquidity. For retail investors, this could mean increased price volatility, as fewer large buyers are consistently absorbing supply. On the other hand, it may also create more entry opportunities, since prices are less supported by steady institutional accumulation and more responsive to broader market cycles.
    source: https://www.tradingview.com/news/coinpedia:8c3408e52094b:0-is-the-corporate-bitcoin-treasury-trend-dead-saylor-s-strategy-is-the-only-one-buying/

    1 条回复 最后回复
    0

    你好!看起来您对这段对话很感兴趣,但您还没有一个账号。

    厌倦了每次访问都刷到同样的帖子?您注册账号后,您每次返回时都能精准定位到您上次浏览的位置,并可选择接收新回复通知(通过邮件或推送通知)。您还能收藏书签、为帖子顶,向社区成员表达您的欣赏。

    有了你的建议,这篇帖子会更精彩哦 💗

    注册 登录
    回复
    • 在新帖中回复
    登录后回复
    • 从旧到新
    • 从新到旧
    • 最多赞同


    • 登录

    • 没有帐号? 注册

    • 登录或注册以进行搜索。
    Powered by NodeBB Contributors
    • 第一个帖子
      最后一个帖子
    0
    • home
    • News
    • How to
    • Coin information
    • Bot Lab
    • General Discussion
    • 最新
    • 热门
    • 标签