跳转至内容
  • home
  • News
  • How to
  • Coin information
  • Bot Lab
  • General Discussion
  • 最新
  • 热门
  • 标签
皮肤
  • 浅色
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • 深色
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • 默认(不使用皮肤)
  • 不使用皮肤
折叠

Coinsori

  1. 主页
  2. News
  3. 'It's a Rug-Pull': Adam Back Issues Warning to Bitcoin Users Over BIP-110

“这可能是一场骗局”:Adam Back 警告比特币用户注意 BIP-110

已定时 已固定 已锁定 已移动 News
1 帖子 1 发布者 2 浏览 1 关注中
  • 从旧到新
  • 从新到旧
  • 最多赞同
回复
  • 在新帖中回复
登录后回复
此主题已被删除。只有拥有主题管理权限的用户可以查看。
  • 라 离线
    라 离线
    라온
    编写于 最后由 编辑
    #1

    Adam Back, the well-known cypherpunk and CEO of Blockstream, continues to deliver fierce criticism of BIP-110, calling it a potential threat to network stability and trust in Bitcoin as a store of value.

    For those not familiar, BIP-110 is a Bitcoin Improvement Proposal aimed at clearing the blockchain of junk data, images and videos created through protocols such as Ordinals and Runes by introducing a temporary 12-month soft fork.

    Is BIP-110 a hidden rug-pull of Bitcoin?

    In a fresh X post, Back supported the view that proponents of BIP-110 are ready to go as far as sacrificing ordinary users if it helps punish spammers. According to him, the key risks include the freezing of funds tied to existing transaction outputs, which would effectively mean loss of access to funds for some users, as well as the danger of a chain split.

    The proposal suggests activation with support from just 50% of the hash rate instead of the traditional 95%, which could lead to BTC splitting into two competing chains. There is also reputational damage, which Back describes as an attempt at a lynch mob and an attack on Bitcoin’s neutrality.

    Back argues that spam is an unnecessary inconvenience rather than a security threat, and that fighting it through measures like BIP-110 would cause more harm than the data itself.

    Adam Back
    @adam3us
    he's not alone, 110-think that it's ok to rug-pull users if it rug-pulls spammers also. (then to downplay how crazy they are rug-pulling users and bitcoin SoV confidence). anyway 110 is dead on arrival, but it's curious how reckless they are because they see red with spammers.

    At the moment, the proposal is supported only by a small share of nodes — around 2.4% to 4.5% — mainly those running the Bitcoin Knots client. The largest mining pools have so far shown no interest in the initiative.

    Back concludes that BIP-110 is effectively "dead on arrival," and that the willingness of part of the community to consider such radical and reckless measures is deeply concerning to the Bitcoin pioneer.
    source: https://www.tradingview.com/news/u_today:1da86d517094b:0-it-s-a-rug-pull-adam-back-issues-warning-to-bitcoin-users-over-bip-110/

    1 条回复 最后回复
    0

    你好!看起来您对这段对话很感兴趣,但您还没有一个账号。

    厌倦了每次访问都刷到同样的帖子?您注册账号后,您每次返回时都能精准定位到您上次浏览的位置,并可选择接收新回复通知(通过邮件或推送通知)。您还能收藏书签、为帖子顶,向社区成员表达您的欣赏。

    有了你的建议,这篇帖子会更精彩哦 💗

    注册 登录
    回复
    • 在新帖中回复
    登录后回复
    • 从旧到新
    • 从新到旧
    • 最多赞同


    • 登录

    • 没有帐号? 注册

    • 登录或注册以进行搜索。
    Powered by NodeBB Contributors
    • 第一个帖子
      最后一个帖子
    0
    • home
    • News
    • How to
    • Coin information
    • Bot Lab
    • General Discussion
    • 最新
    • 热门
    • 标签