跳转至内容
  • home
  • News
  • How to
  • Coin information
  • Bot Lab
  • General Discussion
  • 最新
  • 热门
  • 标签
皮肤
  • 浅色
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • 深色
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • 默认(不使用皮肤)
  • 不使用皮肤
折叠

Coinsori

  1. 主页
  2. News
  3. Ripple's Schwartz Question if Bitcoin Tech Matter

瑞波公司Schwartz质疑比特币技术的重要性

已定时 已固定 已锁定 已移动 News
1 帖子 1 发布者 1 浏览
  • 从旧到新
  • 从新到旧
  • 最多赞同
回复
  • 在新帖中回复
登录后回复
此主题已被删除。只有拥有主题管理权限的用户可以查看。
  • K 离线
    K 离线
    kim
    编写于 最后由 编辑
    #1

    The Bitcoin network’s tech is under renewed scrutiny following a rare "two-block reorg" that saw a single mining entity, Foundry USA, seize control of seven consecutive blocks.

    The event has reignited a debate over the long-term viability of the proof-of-work (PoW) consensus mechanism.

    Ripple CTO David "JoelKatz" Schwartz has weighed in on the matter, arguing that Bitcoin's greatest strength might actually be a centralizing liability.

    Proof-of-work as a "centralizing force"

    Bitcoin proponents often cite PoW as the gold standard for decentralization, but Schwartz offered a contrarian perspective. He has argued that PoW is actually a "centralizing force" that the network is constantly forced to fight against.

    "It really demonstrates a point that I've made several times," Schwartz noted on X. "Bitcoin's decentralization doesn't come from its use of PoW; rather, PoW is a centralizing force Bitcoin has to keep fighting against."

    The tech vs. first-mover debate

    Schwartz was then asked if the market is beginning to "price in" the systemic risks and perceived inefficiencies of the PoW model.

    The Ripple veteran has admitted that these concerns could be exerting "downward pressure" on the price of Bitcoin, but he noted that such a trend is nearly impossible to prove with hard evidence.

    A governance conundrum

    There is also a Catch-22 facing the Bitcoin community regarding mining centralization, according to Schwartz.

    If the community attempts to change the mining algorithm to fix these issues, it proves that "nothing is guaranteed" and that the "mathematical immutability" of the system is subject to human intervention. Conversely, if they leave it as is, it establishes that network security is permanently tied to a centralizing arms race.

    source: https://www.tradingview.com/news/u_today:e43fa155b094b:0-ripple-s-schwartz-question-if-bitcoin-tech-matters/

    1 条回复 最后回复
    0

    你好!看起来您对这段对话很感兴趣,但您还没有一个账号。

    厌倦了每次访问都刷到同样的帖子?您注册账号后,您每次返回时都能精准定位到您上次浏览的位置,并可选择接收新回复通知(通过邮件或推送通知)。您还能收藏书签、为帖子顶,向社区成员表达您的欣赏。

    有了你的建议,这篇帖子会更精彩哦 💗

    注册 登录
    回复
    • 在新帖中回复
    登录后回复
    • 从旧到新
    • 从新到旧
    • 最多赞同


    • 登录

    • 没有帐号? 注册

    • 登录或注册以进行搜索。
    Powered by NodeBB Contributors
    • 第一个帖子
      最后一个帖子
    0
    • home
    • News
    • How to
    • Coin information
    • Bot Lab
    • General Discussion
    • 最新
    • 热门
    • 标签